Skip to main content

RWC School Board March 5th Budget Meeting

On March 5th, the Redwood City School District held a special meeting to discuss the impending budget cuts. This is a brief report of this meeting. This is not my own editorial comment about the situation. That might follow later.

The meeting took place in the School Board's meeting room, filled to capacity. The whole School Board, the Superintendent and other district staff were present. Contrary to my expectations, the purpose of the meeting was not to discuss which specific cuts are expected in Redwood City given the 10% across the board cuts proposed by Sacramento. Instead, board member Shelly Masur told us that the purpose of the meeting was to mobilize the community to see what we can do to prevent these cuts from taking place.

The Superintendent started with a brief speech in which she emphasized the great progress Redwood City schools have been making and how the proposed cuts would "slam the breaks" on this progress. She pointed out that we've spent around a million training teachers in the new methodologies and that the cuts would result in the loss of such trained teachers.

Raul Parungao, Chief Business Officer, showed the impact of the cuts on California by comparing the state's amount spent per child with New Jersey 05-06 data. New Jersey is the state that spends the most per student. Highlights:

  • New Jersey spent $12,300 per student in 05-06. The amount they're currently spending is probably higher due to cost of living adjustments.

  • California is #46 in the nation, spending about $9,000 per student.

  • Every year there's a cost of living adjustment made, which was expected to be about $450 this year.

  • On top of that the Governor specified a deficit of 6.99% resulting in $750 taken out of the total amount.

  • The overall result is $300 less per student for next year, but a total loss of $750 because all budget projections were expecting the cost of living adjustment.

The Redwood City School District is mandated to keep a 3% cash reserve by the state and in past years the School Board increased the requirement to 6%. This means that by reducing the reserves to the minimum 3% the School Board will be able to mitigate the cuts somewhat... but only for 1 year.

The School Board needs to operate under the assumption that the cuts are happening. It is required to prepare a balanced budget for the next three years by June 30th. This means that cuts will need to be made regardless of the ongoing budget fights in Sacramento. The Democrats in the legislature are declaring the cuts unacceptable and are promising to fight to restore funding, but this process will undoubtedly keep going during the summer and won't prevent the planning of our local cuts. To make matters worse, as soon as the real budget is signed by the Governor, the district has 45 days to revise it for the final version.

The upshot of this is that cuts will need to be made, possibly to be unmade later. This means layoff notices are being sent to teachers now and all programs need to be under consideration.

Raul pointed out that in 03-04 we faced the same problems and it's taken the district 4 years to recover from that mess. One of the handouts from the meeting shows that Redwood City has made cuts in 4 of the last 5 years.

The rest of the meeting was spent brainstorming on ways to avoid the cuts. There was some consensus that contacting legislators is key and that it's crucial to get everyone we know anywhere in California to participate in a letter writing campaign. It's not enough if only parents of school aged children do this. We need the whole community to participate.

The Parent Club at Clifford has started a letter writing campaign. At the meeting, parents from other schools signed up to carry out the campaign at their schools. The letters will be collected and delivered to the legislators and Governor, hopefully with some notice by the media.

The next steps for the District at this point:

  • Next week they need to approve an interim budget, projecting the next 3 years.

  • The District is forming a financial advisory committee with community and staff.

  • The District has added a Budget discussion item to each and every board meeting from now to the end of June.

  • The District now has to come up with a budget that is balanced under the current worst-case assumptions by June 30th.

The meeting ended with a call to energize the community and come up with creative ways to stop these cuts from happening.

My complete notes from the meeting can be found here: meeting notes. Most of it is covered in this writeup.

The school district has a full page about the budget crisis with a number of useful handouts. And here's a link to a page containing the sample letters to legislators.


Popular posts from this blog

The Best Online Traffic School?

After paying my red light ticket, the epic story described in a previous post, the San Mateo County Southern Branch Court provided me with a list of about 80 approved online schools. Which one to choose? I expected the Internet in all its collective wisdom to provide the answer with a comprehensive site of traffic school reviews including all sorts of evaluation criteria (price, time to complete, use of animations, etc) and user rankings. To my disappointment, no such site seems to exist. I was faced with scanning a large list of URLs to pick a traffic school.

The first approach was to start entering URLs in the browser and try to deduce, from the home page, whether the traffic school would be right. Here's the list of schools approved by San Mateo County:

An ideal traffic school for me would be:

Responsive. Pages load fast. No stupid artificial delays like I experienced many years ago when I tried an online tra…

My red light ticket story

Where I recount my true experience with a red light ticket and the San Mateo Country traffic court system...

The Infraction

About a month ago I received in the mail a notice of a red light violation. The notice included four photographs: one of me from the front, one of my license plate and two from the back showing the traffic light (already in Red) and my car about to enter the intersection and then half way across the intersection. The pictures  contain timing information highly relevant to the case. The first picture:

Location: El Camino Real and Glenwood Ave., Menlo Park, CA
Date: Friday, 13th March 2009
Speed Limit: 35MPH
Lane: 2
Vehicle Speed: 36MPH
Elapsed time: 0.00

The next picture shows my car half way into the intersection, and the data shows:

RED: 0.86
Elapsed Time: 0.75

The notice does not explain any of this, but we can interpret it as follows: when the light went red I had not entered the intersection yet. This is clearly shown in picture 1. The second picture shows that 0.75 seco…

High Def, Low Def and Now Ultra Low Def TV

High Definition TV is great, amazing, a must have for sports. How did we ever manage to watch soccer games without it? Unfortunately, I'm forced to remember the horror every weekend, where I move from Barcelona's glorious HDTV courtesy of GolTV HD to Boca's horrific, ultra low def, courtesy of TyC Sports.

I claim that the video quality we get from TyC for these Argentinean soccer games is lower than Low Definition. Games look, really, really bad, much worse than low definition games you see on ESPN or even Univision. I don't know why, but here's the evidence.

What follows is snapshots of my LCD TV, with signal from DirecTV, comparing High Definition to whatever this other thing is. I used my digital camera, taking pictures at max resolution.

First, a snapshot of this weekend's Barcelona Vs. Osasuna game.

Very pretty. Now here's the capture of today's glorious Boca Juniors victory over Huracán.

To highlight the differences even further, I took a picture …