Skip to main content

The closing argument

Tomorrow is election day. Finally! It's been incredibly hard to live for 8 years with George Bush in the White House. The worst presidency in the history of the United States is almost over... And not a moment too soon.

The time is upon us to issue a categorical and unequivocal repudiation of the last eight years:

  • No more incompetence in government!

  • No more dismantling of the social welfare net!

  • No more tax cuts for the rich!

  • No more preemptive wars!

  • No more unilateral foreign policy!

  • No more no-bid contracts for cronies and no more war profiteering!

  • No more free market fundamentalism!

  • No more torture! No more Guantanamo! No more "compromises" on civil rights.

  • No more... (add your own)


In this election the choice is clear. The republican party offers a continuation of these disastrous policies. More isolation abroad and more deterioration at home.

On the home front, the policies of the last 30 years, this radical right wing experiment, are causing the "Latin-Americanization of the United States". People without health care. People that give up on public education. People that become afraid of the poor and move to virtual closed neighborhoods. Visit a large Latin American city to see what we're turning into. You will not like it.

Abroad, the standing of the United States is the lowest it's been in my lifetime. The illegal war in Iraq showed total disregard for international law and its institutions. And any good will the American people still enjoyed vanished when we elected Bush in 2004 (we did not actually re-elect him, but that's little consolation).

Now is the time to change direction. We can restore our position in the world, make the country safer and radically improve conditions at home. But only if we elect Barack Obama and if we achieve a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.

The filibuster proof majority is key. We need to pass major legislation, starting with health care, which the republicans and their masters will fight every step of the way. We should not expect bipartisan cooperation from their side.

Finally, why do we need Obama to win this election? For many, many reasons:

For the return of competence to government. The republicans pontificate about the evils of government, but government is evil only when they run it. Government works under Democrats because Democrats believe in the role of government. Obama will restore competent people to key posts and disasters like FEMA's handling of the Katrina response will not happen under his watch.

For the return of reason and thought to the Presidency, the highest role model of the land. Obama's background shows him to be a thinker, an intellectually curious individual, a rational being. He seems sure enough of himself to listen to competing sides of an argument and make rational decisions. In the campaign he has shown he has the strength and patience to avoid impulsive reactions. Instead he provides careful, well thought out leadership.

For the return of policies for the common people. The class war is real, it's been waged continuously for the last 30 years and the rich have won. Inequality has risen to levels rivaling the Gilded Age. The current economic crisis requires a government that can act to restore balance and save the economy by helping the masses of working people and the poor. Enough damage has been done already. Health care reform is only the first step of a program that needs to restore the welfare state, mirroring all other advanced democracies.

For the return of regulation to save capitalism. Temporary insanity allowed rampant deregulation to remove key checks on capitalism. The notion that the free market would regulate itself has been spectacularly discredited by facts. Only fundamentalist free market dogma, supported by a well oiled PR machine, allowed these reforms to be passed in the first place.

For the return of a rational foreign policy. For the end of unilateral bullying of other countries. For an era of peace and respect of international law. Ending the war in Iraq, closing down Guantanamo, re-engaging other countries and using diplomacy and international institutions to work together with other countries can restore the United States position as an important and respected member of the international community. An apology would be nice too, but that's too much to expect, even from Obama.

For taking concrete action to save the planet from our own impact. Global warming is real and we've wasted precious years under republican rule. Controlling the damage and reversing the trend will require a massive effort at home and a concerted diplomatic push abroad. The good will that electing Barack Obama generates overseas can help allow the United States to play a leadership role in achieving a truly global initiative. And Obama has a plan to combat Global Warming which can get things rolling right away.

And finally, for the triumph of enlightenment over racism. Who could have predicted, only a few years ago, that an African American candidate could be so close to being President of the United States? The younger generations seem to be already in a post-racial frame of mind, but with Barack Obama we might not need to wait for them to achieve critical mass. The moment could be right now. And what better way to repudiate the last few years and signal real change than electing the first black President?

I grew up in Argentina under a military dictatorship. In 1983 we held elections and democracy returned. It was the end of one of the darkest periods in our history and the election was a historic cathartic moment for the country. Democracy was welcome with huge, extended parties befitting the start of a period full of hope and promise. This election feels exactly the same way to me. We're on the verge of moving on and putting behind us a dark period of history. And it could all end tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

High Def, Low Def and Now Ultra Low Def TV

High Definition TV is great, amazing, a must have for sports. How did we ever manage to watch soccer games without it? Unfortunately, I'm forced to remember the horror every weekend, where I move from Barcelona's glorious HDTV courtesy of GolTV HD to Boca's horrific, ultra low def, courtesy of TyC Sports.

I claim that the video quality we get from TyC for these Argentinean soccer games is lower than Low Definition. Games look, really, really bad, much worse than low definition games you see on ESPN or even Univision. I don't know why, but here's the evidence.

What follows is snapshots of my LCD TV, with signal from DirecTV, comparing High Definition to whatever this other thing is. I used my digital camera, taking pictures at max resolution.

First, a snapshot of this weekend's Barcelona Vs. Osasuna game.



Very pretty. Now here's the capture of today's glorious Boca Juniors victory over Huracán.



To highlight the differences even further, I took a picture …

Should I move to Redwood City and send my kids to its Public Schools?

A coworker recently asked me the following question:
I have a 2 year old daughter and we're considering buying a house. Redwood City is more affordable than other communities, but I'm worried about the public schools. So, should I consider moving to Redwood City?
The short answer is a resounding "yes!". I have two daughters, ages 13 and 11 who have experienced the Redwood City Public School system first hand and all the way through. For elementary school, both went to Orion, a wonderful, very small school based on parent participation. The school is cozy and beautiful, the teachers are great, and the community is incredible. A fantastic experience.

Orion, ends in 5th grade and before High School you have to pick a Middle School. The default choice is Kennedy Middle School, the largest middle school in Redwood City. Both my daughters are now at Kennedy, one in 6th grade, the other one in 8th. Kennedy is a completely different experience. It's large and diverse, admit…

Thoughts on "Waiting for Superman"

I missed "Waiting for Superman" when it was in theaters and recently got a chance to see it during a long flight, yes, on one of those tiny LCD screens. The film was rather controversial in educational circles when it came out and I was expecting a large reaction to its point of view, or approach to the subject or its choice of culprits for the current state of things. Not so. I thought the movie was quite sensible, that it made a number of valid points and that it was pretty fair.

One thing I did not enjoy was the focus of the ending on the lotteries that would decide whether the kids we had been following would get into their respective Charter schools, schools that would be the difference between success and failure. Dramatically the scenes work and we're on the edge of our seats waiting to see if they make it in (most do not!), but the emotional kick from these scenes undoes a very important point the movie makes about Charter schools: just like normal schools, some …